<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Sandbox AKA &#8216;Ageing Filter&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tim-gregory.com/2009/07/the-google-sandbox-aka-ageing-filter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tim-gregory.com/2009/07/the-google-sandbox-aka-ageing-filter/</link>
	<description>personal blog about all things Agile, SEO, Web Development, Scrum, Usability, Photography and whatever else I blurt out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Fox</title>
		<link>http://tim-gregory.com/2009/07/the-google-sandbox-aka-ageing-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tim-gregory.com/?p=72#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Tim, great post again!
I have 2 domains - www.stylus.co.za (my old site that includes a WordPress blog) and www.cape-hike.co.za (which is just a WordPress blog).
I definitely experienced something similar with the second one, and have been battling to understand what happened. What you are describing makes sense, and seems to fit my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, great post again!<br />
I have 2 domains &#8211; <a href="http://www.stylus.co.za" rel="nofollow">http://www.stylus.co.za</a> (my old site that includes a WordPress blog) and <a href="http://www.cape-hike.co.za" rel="nofollow">http://www.cape-hike.co.za</a> (which is just a WordPress blog).<br />
I definitely experienced something similar with the second one, and have been battling to understand what happened. What you are describing makes sense, and seems to fit my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Ibiza</title>
		<link>http://tim-gregory.com/2009/07/the-google-sandbox-aka-ageing-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Ibiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tim-gregory.com/?p=72#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim. 

it&#039;s not &quot;T3h S4ndb0x&quot; dude it&#039;s just the end of your Google honeymoon and / or Google dropping the site from the index for a day or 2, all perfectly normal behaviour for new domains. 

one or two &lt;strong&gt;decent&lt;/strong&gt; links would likely sort this out, and if you do nothing I&#039;d still expect to see those rankings return anyway, after all they&#039;re not competitive are they? 

5 days old is far too soon to be drawing any conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim. </p>
<p>it&#8217;s not &#8220;T3h S4ndb0x&#8221; dude it&#8217;s just the end of your Google honeymoon and / or Google dropping the site from the index for a day or 2, all perfectly normal behaviour for new domains. </p>
<p>one or two <strong>decent</strong> links would likely sort this out, and if you do nothing I&#8217;d still expect to see those rankings return anyway, after all they&#8217;re not competitive are they? </p>
<p>5 days old is far too soon to be drawing any conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.249 seconds -->
